|

What is an Assault Weapon?

We all know “assault weapon” is a loaded term cooked up by the anti-gun crowd. No need to hammer that point home, you’re preaching to the choir here. But lately, we’ve been flooded with messages and emails from folks trying to wrap their heads around what exactly these bans are targeting. And honestly, it’s a hot mess.

Between two stand alone bills, H5436 in the House and S0359, which the Senate just introduced on Friday, February 21st, and the Governor’s budget proposal with its own version of the ban (H5076 Art 11), the confusion is real.

What’s even more surprising? We’re hearing from some gun owners who think these bills aren’t as bad as they seem. We emphatically disagree. This isn’t just another regulation, it’s the most egregious assault on our Second Amendment rights this year, and they’re pushing hard to get it though.

So, we did some heavy lifting and dug into each proposal. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of how THEY are defining an “assault weapon” in the proposed legislation.

We’ve color-coded the chart for easier reading: Yellow cells indicate the least restrictive wording for that particular item.

AWB Bill Comparison

Feature Listed in the Bill: Senate Bill S0359 Governor's Budget House Bill H5436
Semi-Auto Shotguns
Fixed Magazine Capacity More than 6 rounds More than 8 rounds More than 6 rounds
Ability to accept or be modified to accept Detachable Magazine. NA Yes (Single Feature Qualifies) NA
Ability to accept or be modified to accept Detachable Magazine  (PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES LISTED BELOW) Yes NA Yes
Folding/Telescoping/Detachable Stock Yes Yes (Single Feature Qualifies) Yes
Pistol Grip/Thumbhole Stock Yes No Yes
Grenade Launcher No Yes (Single Feature Qualifies) No
Protruding Grip for non-firing hand Yes No Yes
Any Shotgun
Revolving Cylinder Yes Yes Yes
Semi-Auto Rifles
Fixed Magazine Capacity More than 10 Rounds Yes Yes Yes
Ability to accept or be modified to accept Detachable Magazine  (PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES LISTED BELOW) Yes Yes Yes
Folding/Telescoping/Detachable Stock (Rifles) Yes Yes Yes
Bayonet Mount (Rifles) Yes Yes Yes
Grenade Launcher (Rifles) Yes Yes Yes
Shroud That Surrounds the Barrel (Rifles) Yes Yes Yes
Pistol Grip/Thumbhole Stock (Rifles) Yes No Yes
Flash Suppressor (Rifles) Yes No Yes
Threaded Barrel (Rifles) Yes No Yes
Exclusion for .22 Caliber Rimfire Tubular Magazines Yes Yes Yes
Semi- Auto Pistols
Fixed Magazine Capacity More than 10 Rounds Yes Yes Yes
Ability to accept or be modified to accept Detachable Magazine  (PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES LISTED BELOW) Yes Yes Yes
Magazine Located outside the Pistol Grip Yes Yes Yes
Threaded Barrel Yes Yes Yes
Shroud Around Barrel (Excluding the Slide) Yes Yes Yes
Unloaded Weight of 50 oz. or More Yes Yes Yes
Buffer Tube Army Brace, Other Part the Protrudes behind the Pistol Grip Designed  or can be Designed for Shoulder Firing Yes Yes Yes
Misc
Belt-Fed Firearms Yes Yes Yes
Firearms Modified to be an Assault Weapon Yes Yes Yes
Combination Parts in Posession That Can Be Assembled into an Assault Weapon Yes Yes Yes

NOTE: If you have any corrections please contact us so we can update.

So, there you have it, the clearest comparison of these bills we could put together. They differ slightly, but the goal is the same: strip away your inalienable rights by banning firearms based on arbitrary features dreamed up by politicians who know nothing about firearms.

Whether you’re a seasoned advocate or just trying to keep up, knowing what’s at stake is the first step to fighting back. The next step? Disaffiliate so we can vote in the primary.

Disaffiliation Campaign

If you are unaware of the ongoing disaffiliation campaign get more info here

Related Articles